Skip to main content
Skip to main content

Value Engineering Procedures

Document Type: Procedure
Version: 1.0
Last Updated: February 2026
Distribute To: Estimators, Project Managers, Preconstruction


Purposeโ€‹

Establish procedures for identifying and implementing value engineering opportunities to reduce costs without sacrificing function or quality.


What is Value Engineering?โ€‹

Value Engineering (VE) analyzes functions to identify ways to:

  • Reduce cost
  • Maintain or improve function
  • Maintain quality requirements
  • Meet owner objectives

Value Engineering vs. Cost Cutting:โ€‹

Value EngineeringCost Cutting
Maintains functionMay reduce function
Thoughtful analysisQuick reductions
Owner benefitsMay benefit contractor only
Often improves designMay reduce quality
CollaborativeMay be adversarial

When to Apply VEโ€‹

Timing Opportunities:โ€‹

PhaseOpportunitySavings Potential
Design (early)Highest10-30%
Design (late)Good5-15%
BiddingModerate3-10%
ConstructionLimited1-5%

Earlier = Better: More freedom to change, lower redesign costs.


Value Engineering Processโ€‹

Step 1: Information Gatheringโ€‹

Understand:

  • Project requirements
  • Owner priorities
  • Budget constraints
  • Code requirements
  • Schedule needs

Analyze:

  • High-cost items
  • Complex systems
  • Over-specified items
  • Constructability issues

Step 2: Function Analysisโ€‹

For Each Element, Ask:

  • What is its function?
  • Is that function necessary?
  • What else could provide that function?
  • What is the cost of the function?

Function Categories:

  • Basic: Primary purpose (must have)
  • Secondary: Supporting purpose (nice to have)

Step 3: Creative Phaseโ€‹

Generate Alternatives:

  • Different materials
  • Different systems
  • Different methods
  • Eliminate unnecessary items
  • Simplify complexity

Brainstorming Rules:

  • No criticism during ideation
  • Quantity over quality initially
  • Build on others' ideas
  • Wild ideas welcome

Step 4: Evaluationโ€‹

For Each Alternative, Evaluate:

  • Cost savings
  • Impact on function
  • Impact on quality
  • Impact on schedule
  • Risk/feasibility
  • Owner acceptance likelihood

Step 5: Developmentโ€‹

For Promising Ideas:

  • Detailed cost analysis
  • Technical feasibility
  • Drawings/specifications
  • Risk assessment
  • Recommendation

Step 6: Presentationโ€‹

VE Proposal Should Include:

  • Current condition/cost
  • Proposed alternative
  • Cost comparison
  • Function comparison
  • Quality impact
  • Schedule impact
  • Recommendation

VE Proposal Formatโ€‹

================================================================
VALUE ENGINEERING PROPOSAL
================================================================

VE Item #: ____________ Date: ____________

Project: ___________________________________________________

Prepared By: _______________________________________________

================================================================

DESCRIPTION:

Current Design:
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________

Proposed Alternative:
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________

================================================================

COST COMPARISON:

Current Design Cost: $____________________
Proposed Alternative Cost: $____________________
โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
SAVINGS: $____________________

Design/Coordination Cost: $____________________
NET SAVINGS: $____________________

================================================================

FUNCTION ANALYSIS:

โ˜ Maintains required function
โ˜ Improves function
โ˜ Reduces function (explain): ______________________________

Quality Impact:
โ˜ No impact โ˜ Improved โ˜ Reduced (explain): ______________

Schedule Impact:
โ˜ No impact โ˜ Faster โ˜ Slower: ______ days

================================================================

FEASIBILITY:

Technical: โ˜ High โ˜ Medium โ˜ Low
Owner acceptance: โ˜ Likely โ˜ Possible โ˜ Unlikely

Risks/Concerns:
___________________________________________________________

================================================================

RECOMMENDATION:

โ˜ Recommend adoption
โ˜ Further study needed
โ˜ Not recommended (explain): _______________________________

================================================================

APPROVALS:

Owner: _____________________________ Date: ________________
Architect: _________________________ Date: ________________
Contractor: ________________________ Date: ________________

================================================================

Common VE Opportunitiesโ€‹

Structural:โ€‹

CurrentAlternativeConsideration
Steel frameConcreteMarket conditions
Cast-in-placePrecastSchedule, quality
Deep foundationsShallowSoil conditions
Over-designRight-sizeEngineering

Mechanical:โ€‹

CurrentAlternativeConsideration
Central plantDistributedFirst cost vs. operating
VAVVRFSpace, efficiency
Copper pipePEXApplication, code
Complex BMSSimple controlsOwner capability

Electrical:โ€‹

CurrentAlternativeConsideration
Copper wireAluminum (feeders)Size, application
Custom lightingStandardLead time, cost
Over-designedRight-sizeLoad analysis

Architectural:โ€‹

CurrentAlternativeConsideration
Curtain wallStorefrontPerformance needs
Natural stoneManufacturedAppearance, durability
Custom millworkStandardDesign intent
High-end finishesValue alternativesOwner priorities

VE Program Managementโ€‹

Tracking VE Items:โ€‹

IDDescriptionSavingsStatus
VE-001Proposed/Accepted/Rejected
VE-002
VE-003

Sharing Savings:โ€‹

  • Per contract terms
  • Typical: 50/50 owner/contractor
  • May vary by delivery method

Constructability Reviewโ€‹

Constructability = Can we build it efficiently?

Review For:

  • Sequence issues
  • Access limitations
  • Tolerance coordination
  • Material availability
  • Labor skill requirements
  • Schedule impacts

Constructability VE:

  • Simpler connections
  • Standardized elements
  • Prefabrication opportunities
  • Sequence optimization

Owner Considerationsโ€‹

When Presenting VE:โ€‹

Do:

  • Focus on owner benefit
  • Maintain quality/function
  • Present professional proposals
  • Be honest about trade-offs
  • Support design team

Don't:

  • Criticize design team
  • Propose quality reductions
  • Hide trade-offs
  • Push inappropriate ideas
  • Make it adversarial

  • Estimating Standards
  • Preconstruction Services
  • Change Order Management
  • Submittal Process

Template provided by support.construction. Value engineering benefits everyone.

Was this page helpful?